Skip to content

Monster recap

By Walter Dean Myers

Every recap below is hidden until you open it. Each one is safe to read once you have finished the chapter it names.

In short (whole book)

Sixteen-year-old film student Steve Harmon is jailed and tried for felony murder after a Harlem drugstore owner dies during a robbery. The prosecution claims Steve checked the store and signaled that it was safe for James King and Richard Evans to enter; Steve records the proceedings as a screenplay and his fear in a journal. Witnesses include admitted participants whose cooperation may reduce their sentences, an eyewitness who places King in the store, and Steve's film teacher, who speaks for his character. Steve testifies that he was not part of the plan. The jury convicts King but acquits Steve. When defense attorney Kathy O'Brien turns away from Steve's grateful embrace, victory gives way to uncertainty. Back home months later, Steve keeps filming himself, trying to discover whether the frightening courtroom image of him says anything true about who he is.

Story so far - through chapter 1 (this book)

Harlem teenager Steve Harmon is held in jail while standing trial for felony murder. A drugstore robbery ended with owner Alguinaldo Nesbitt shot dead, and the prosecution argues that Steve helped by checking the store and giving an all-clear signal before James King and Richard 'Bobo' Evans entered. Terrified that the court sees him only as a criminal, Steve reshapes the experience into a screenplay and keeps a private journal about jail, his family, and his uncertainty about himself. Prosecutor Sandra Petrocelli links the alleged participants into one plan. Testimony comes from neighborhood figures and admitted accomplices, some hoping for leniency, as well as Lorelle Henry, who places King in the store. Defense attorney Kathy O'Brien emphasizes the witnesses' motives and works to distinguish Steve from King and the admitted robbers. Steve's film teacher George Sawicki describes him as a serious, humane student. Steve takes the stand and denies agreeing to act as lookout or giving any signal. The jury finds King guilty and Steve not guilty. O'Brien turns away when Steve tries to embrace her. Five months later, although free, he continues filming himself in an effort to understand her reaction, his father's new distance, and the identity the trial forced upon him.

How does it end? (ending)

Steve testifies that he did not agree to serve as a lookout and did not signal that the drugstore was clear. His lawyer separates his case from the admitted participants and challenges the credibility of witnesses whose testimony benefits themselves. After closing arguments, the jury finds James King guilty but Steve not guilty. Steve reaches toward O'Brien in relief, but she turns away rather than returning his embrace, leaving him uncertain whether even his own advocate believes in the person he wants to be. Five months later, Steve is home and continues making films, repeatedly turning the camera on himself as he tries to understand what O'Brien saw and why his father now seems distant. The acquittal frees him from prison, but it does not resolve his fear that other people—and perhaps Steve himself—cannot confidently separate his identity from the dehumanizing image constructed during the trial.

More about this book

Community-written - CC BY-SA 3.0. Improve this recap